1
Project Brief Review
Review type, location context, design stage, divisions.
Outcome Confirm Line A, B, or A+B fit
Process
Unified project logic from brief through close-out - not an e-commerce order flow. Line A and Line B emphasize different stages; integrated engagements share unified reporting.
2
Scope & Procurement Planning
Feasibility, lead times, Long Lead register / factory match.
Outcome Agreed procurement approach
3
Technical / Sample Review
Sample and technical checkpoints (Line A emphasis).
Outcome Approved reference before bulk
4
RFQ & Quotation Coordination
Confidential quotation cycles within scope.
Outcome Project-confidential pricing path
5
Authorization / Contract Channel (when applicable)
NDA readiness, channel alignment (Line B).
Outcome Readiness to proceed with imports
6
Production / Long Lead Tracking
QC milestones (A); Long Lead dashboard (B).
Outcome Visibility - not guaranteed lead times
7
Delivery Integration
Batching, docs, arrival vs site readiness.
Outcome Sequenced delivery plan
8
Reporting & Close-out
Status reports, division summaries, close memo.
Outcome Documented project close
Line A vs Line B Emphasis
Line A emphasis: Stages 3, 4, 6 - samples, production, QC, shipping.
Line B emphasis: Stages 2, 5, 6, 8 - divisions, authorization, Long Lead, reporting.
A+B: Unified reporting in Stage 8; interface focus in Stages 2-C3.
MINGARC does not replace designers, main contractors, logistics providers, or legal counsel. Fastest delivery is not guaranteed.